Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, the paper contains too much in amendments and additions and there is no clear conclusion.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1911].

Endorsed on verso as received 5 October 1909.

Reference number
RR/17/444
Earliest possible date
04 October 1909
Physical description
Standardised form (type A) and note on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frederick Orpen Bower

View page for Frederick Orpen Bower

Use this record

Citation

Frederick Orpen Bower, Referee's report by Frederick Orpen Bower, on a paper 'The anatomy and morphology of the leaves and inflorescences of Welwitschia mirabilis' by M G Sykes, 04 October 1909, RR/17/444, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_444/referees-report-by-frederick-orpen-bower-on-a-paper-the-anatomy-and-morphology-of-the-leaves-and-inflorescences-of-welwitschia-mirabilis-by-m-g-sykes, accessed on 10 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_444/referees-report-by-frederick-orpen-bower-on-a-paper-the-anatomy-and-morphology-of-the-leaves-and-inflorescences-of-welwitschia-mirabilis-by-m-g-sykes" title="Referee's report by Frederick Orpen Bower, on a paper 'The anatomy and morphology of the leaves and inflorescences of Welwitschia mirabilis' by M G Sykes" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection