Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Geology

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. A previous paper by the author has been published, but if the reviewer remembers correctly, he advised against publishing that paper too.

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 7 January 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/4
Earliest possible date
05 January 1907
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Richard Lydekker

View page for Richard Lydekker

Use this record

Citation

Richard Lydekker, Referee's report by Richard Lydekker, on a paper 'Elephant remains from Crete with description of Elephas creticus Sp.Nov.' by Dorothea Minola Alice Bate, 05 January 1907, RR/17/4, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_4/referees-report-by-richard-lydekker-on-a-paper-elephant-remains-from-crete-with-description-of-elephas-creticus-spnov-by-dorothea-minola-alice-bate, accessed on 14 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_4/referees-report-by-richard-lydekker-on-a-paper-elephant-remains-from-crete-with-description-of-elephas-creticus-spnov-by-dorothea-minola-alice-bate" title="Referee's report by Richard Lydekker, on a paper 'Elephant remains from Crete with description of Elephas creticus Sp.Nov.' by Dorothea Minola Alice Bate" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection