Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Daniel John Cunningham, on a paper 'Description of the brain of Mr Charles Babbage' by Victor Horsley

Reference number: RR/17/299

Date: February 1908

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, recommended for Proceedings instead.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society].

Endorsed on verso as received 24 February 1908.

Reference number
RR/17/299
Earliest possible date
February 1908
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Daniel John Cunningham

View page for Daniel John Cunningham

Use this record

Citation

Daniel John Cunningham, Referee's report by Daniel John Cunningham, on a paper 'Description of the brain of Mr Charles Babbage' by Victor Horsley, February 1908, RR/17/299, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_299/referees-report-by-daniel-john-cunningham-on-a-paper-description-of-the-brain-of-mr-charles-babbage-by-victor-horsley, accessed on 04 December 2023

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_299/referees-report-by-daniel-john-cunningham-on-a-paper-description-of-the-brain-of-mr-charles-babbage-by-victor-horsley" title="Referee's report by Daniel John Cunningham, on a paper 'Description of the brain of Mr Charles Babbage' by Victor Horsley" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection