Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests could possibly go into less detail, 'but would probably appeal less to respectable physiologists'.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 28 April 1906.

Reference number
RR/17/29
Earliest possible date
26 April 1906
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Henry Edward Armstrong

View page for Henry Edward Armstrong

Use this record

Citation

Henry Edward Armstrong, Referee's report by Henry Edward Armstrong, on a paper 'Cyanogenesis in plants. Part IV & V' by Wyndham Rowland Dunstan, Thomas A Henry and S J M Auld, 26 April 1906, RR/17/29, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_29/referees-report-by-henry-edward-armstrong-on-a-paper-cyanogenesis-in-plants-part-iv-v-by-wyndham-rowland-dunstan-thomas-a-henry-and-s-j-m-auld, accessed on 12 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_29/referees-report-by-henry-edward-armstrong-on-a-paper-cyanogenesis-in-plants-part-iv-v-by-wyndham-rowland-dunstan-thomas-a-henry-and-s-j-m-auld" title="Referee's report by Henry Edward Armstrong, on a paper 'Cyanogenesis in plants. Part IV & V' by Wyndham Rowland Dunstan, Thomas A Henry and S J M Auld" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection