Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Geology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions with no modifications, the illustrations which were proposed should be added. The tile of the paper should correspond to the previous installment.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1908].

Endorsed on verso as received 4 February 1908.

Reference number
RR/17/280
Earliest possible date
03 February 1908
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Alfred Harker

View page for Alfred Harker

Use this record

Citation

Alfred Harker, Referee's report by Alfred Harker, on a paper 'Photographical notes on the products of the eruptions of May 1902 at the Soufriere in St Vincent' by John Smith Flett, 03 February 1908, RR/17/280, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_280/referees-report-by-alfred-harker-on-a-paper-photographical-notes-on-the-products-of-the-eruptions-of-may-1902-at-the-soufriere-in-st-vincent-by-john-smith-flett, accessed on 23 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_280/referees-report-by-alfred-harker-on-a-paper-photographical-notes-on-the-products-of-the-eruptions-of-may-1902-at-the-soufriere-in-st-vincent-by-john-smith-flett" title="Referee's report by Alfred Harker, on a paper 'Photographical notes on the products of the eruptions of May 1902 at the Soufriere in St Vincent' by John Smith Flett" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection