Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society', suggests publication in the Proceedings instead. Suggests omitting the first, mathematical part, and reducing part four. Considers the paper too long, especially when the author's previous publications are taken into account, parts of which the current paper reproduces.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on recto as received 27 November 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/229
Earliest possible date
January 1908
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Davidson Niven

View page for William Davidson Niven

Use this record

Citation

William Davidson Niven, Referee's report by William Davidson Niven, on a paper 'Alternate current measurement' by W E Sumpner, January 1908, RR/17/229, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_229/referees-report-by-william-davidson-niven-on-a-paper-alternate-current-measurement-by-w-e-sumpner, accessed on 13 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_229/referees-report-by-william-davidson-niven-on-a-paper-alternate-current-measurement-by-w-e-sumpner" title="Referee's report by William Davidson Niven, on a paper 'Alternate current measurement' by W E Sumpner" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection