Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests the authors consider the suggestions of the referees.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 28 August 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/218
Earliest possible date
August 1907
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Cecil Dampier Whetham

View page for William Cecil Dampier Whetham

Use this record

Citation

William Cecil Dampier Whetham, Referee's report by William Cecil Dampier Whetham, on a paper 'The silver voltameter' by Frank Edward Smith, Thomas Mather and Thomas Martin Lowry, August 1907, RR/17/218, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_218/referees-report-by-william-cecil-dampier-whetham-on-a-paper-the-silver-voltameter-by-frank-edward-smith-thomas-mather-and-thomas-martin-lowry, accessed on 15 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_218/referees-report-by-william-cecil-dampier-whetham-on-a-paper-the-silver-voltameter-by-frank-edward-smith-thomas-mather-and-thomas-martin-lowry" title="Referee's report by William Cecil Dampier Whetham, on a paper 'The silver voltameter' by Frank Edward Smith, Thomas Mather and Thomas Martin Lowry" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection