Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Mathematics

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society', as the paper is too slight.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 1 November 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/198
Earliest possible date
31 October 1907
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Andrew Russell Forsyth

View page for Andrew Russell Forsyth

Use this record

Citation

Andrew Russell Forsyth, Referee's report by Andrew Russell Forsyth, on a paper 'Preliminary note on the operational invariants of a binary quantic' by Percy Alexander MacMahon, 31 October 1907, RR/17/198, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_198/referees-report-by-andrew-russell-forsyth-on-a-paper-preliminary-note-on-the-operational-invariants-of-a-binary-quantic-by-percy-alexander-macmahon, accessed on 23 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_198/referees-report-by-andrew-russell-forsyth-on-a-paper-preliminary-note-on-the-operational-invariants-of-a-binary-quantic-by-percy-alexander-macmahon" title="Referee's report by Andrew Russell Forsyth, on a paper 'Preliminary note on the operational invariants of a binary quantic' by Percy Alexander MacMahon" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection