Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Considers the investigations important, but full tracings are not necessary.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 20 March 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/171
Earliest possible date
April 1907
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frederick Walker Mott

View page for Frederick Walker Mott

Use this record

Citation

Frederick Walker Mott, Referee's report by Frederick Walker Mott, on a paper 'On the occurrence of post-tetanic tremor in several types of muscle' by David Fraser Harris, April 1907, RR/17/171, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_171/referees-report-by-frederick-walker-mott-on-a-paper-on-the-occurrence-of-post-tetanic-tremor-in-several-types-of-muscle-by-david-fraser-harris, accessed on 17 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_171/referees-report-by-frederick-walker-mott-on-a-paper-on-the-occurrence-of-post-tetanic-tremor-in-several-types-of-muscle-by-david-fraser-harris" title="Referee's report by Frederick Walker Mott, on a paper 'On the occurrence of post-tetanic tremor in several types of muscle' by David Fraser Harris" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection