Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'Magnetic declination at Kew Observatory, 1890 to 1900' by Charles Chree

Reference number: RR/17/146

Date: December 1907

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 11 December 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/146
Earliest possible date
December 1907
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Schuster

View page for Arthur Schuster

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Schuster, Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'Magnetic declination at Kew Observatory, 1890 to 1900' by Charles Chree, December 1907, RR/17/146, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_146/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-magnetic-declination-at-kew-observatory-1890-to-1900-by-charles-chree, accessed on 25 February 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_146/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-magnetic-declination-at-kew-observatory-1890-to-1900-by-charles-chree" title="Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'Magnetic declination at Kew Observatory, 1890 to 1900' by Charles Chree" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection