Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. None of the tracings are necessary, but the curves should be redrawn.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 6 June 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/135
Earliest possible date
June 1907
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Ernest Henry Starling

View page for Ernest Henry Starling

Use this record

Citation

Ernest Henry Starling, Referee's report by Ernest Henry Starling, on a paper 'The rate of the assumption of chloroform by the blood during anæsthesia' by George A Buckmaster and J A Gardner, June 1907, RR/17/135, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_135/referees-report-by-ernest-henry-starling-on-a-paper-the-rate-of-the-assumption-of-chloroform-by-the-blood-during-anæsthesia-by-george-a-buckmaster-and-j-a-gardner, accessed on 28 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_135/referees-report-by-ernest-henry-starling-on-a-paper-the-rate-of-the-assumption-of-chloroform-by-the-blood-during-anæsthesia-by-george-a-buckmaster-and-j-a-gardner" title="Referee's report by Ernest Henry Starling, on a paper 'The rate of the assumption of chloroform by the blood during anæsthesia' by George A Buckmaster and J A Gardner" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection