Referees' reports: volume 17, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
Reference number: RR/17
Date: 1906-1909
Description
Containing referee's reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review between 1906 and 1909.
Notable referees and authors include Frank Watson Dyson, John Ambrose Fleming and Arthur Schuster.
When report is on a standard sheet (A), the questions are:
1. Whether the paper should or should not be published in the "Philosophical Transactions"
2. Whether, in the former case, it should be published in full or in part only, the part so to be published being indicated
3. Whether any modifications are necessary or desirable, and, if so, of what nature
4. Which illustrations (if any) accompanying the paper should be reproduced
General remarks
When report is on a standard sheet (C), the questions are:
1. Should the paper be published in the "Proceedings"?
2. If published, should it be printed as it stands, or with modifications?
3. Should all the illustrations be published?
4. If not published, should it be read before the Society?
General remarks
- Reference number
- RR/17
- Earliest possible date
- 1906-1909
- Physical description
- Loose paper in folders
- Page extent
- Two boxes: reports 1-240; reports 241-457
- Format
- Manuscript
Typescript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Referees' reports: volume 17, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1906-1909, RR/17, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17/referees-reports-volume-17-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 15 October 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17/referees-reports-volume-17-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17/referees-reports-volume-17-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 17, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This volume contains 459 manuscripts:
-
Referee's report by William Dobinson Halliburton, on a paper 'On the myelins, myelin bodies, and potential fluid crystals of the organism' by John George Adami and L Aschoff
June 1906 Creator: William Dobinson Halliburton Reference number: RR/17/1 -
Referee's report by William Dobinson Halliburton, on a paper 'Studies on enzyme action.—Lipase: II' by Henry Edward Armstrong
June 1906 Creator: William Dobinson Halliburton Reference number: RR/17/2 -
Referee's report by Sidney Harris Cox Martin, on a paper 'The natural and induced resistance of mice to the growth of cancer' by E F Bashford, J A Murray and W Cramer
03 January 1907 Creator: Sidney Harris Cox Martin Reference number: RR/17/3 -
Referee's report by Richard Lydekker, on a paper 'Elephant remains from Crete with description of Elephas creticus Sp.Nov.' by Dorothea Minola Alice Bate
05 January 1907 Creator: Richard Lydekker Reference number: RR/17/4
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection