Referee's report by Adam Sedgwick, on a paper 'Observations on the development of ornithoryhnchus' by James Thomas Wilson and James Peter Hill
Reference number: RR/16/408
Date: 13 March 1906
Description
Sectional Committee: Zoology
The paper so far as it relates to the development of Ornithoryhnchus should be published in the Philosophical Transactions. The paper should be published in part only; where the developmental stages are familiar there is no need for lengthy descriptions. As a contribution to embryological science, the paper would loose nothing if it were shortened by at least a half. The descriptions are too detailed in many cases and the discussions unduly prolonged, and both are most tedious in nearly all cases. The paper could be returned to the authors with the request to limit it to the description of the ornithological embryos and omit the account of the marsupial embryos. A certain number of the photographic figures might be omitted but on the whole, with regard to the value and rarity of the material, the authors have not made excessive demands. Lists figure numbers that seem unnecessary. Thinks the authors have erred in their interpretation of the structure called 'primitive know' in their gastular stage.
[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1908].
Endorsed on verso as received 14 March 1906.
- Reference number
- RR/16/408
- Earliest possible date
- 13 March 1906
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type A) and not on paper
- Page extent
- 4 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Adam Sedgwick, Referee's report by Adam Sedgwick, on a paper 'Observations on the development of ornithoryhnchus' by James Thomas Wilson and James Peter Hill, 13 March 1906, RR/16/408, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_408/referees-report-by-adam-sedgwick-on-a-paper-observations-on-the-development-of-ornithoryhnchus-by-james-thomas-wilson-and-james-peter-hill, accessed on 14 September 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_408/referees-report-by-adam-sedgwick-on-a-paper-observations-on-the-development-of-ornithoryhnchus-by-james-thomas-wilson-and-james-peter-hill
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_408/referees-report-by-adam-sedgwick-on-a-paper-observations-on-the-development-of-ornithoryhnchus-by-james-thomas-wilson-and-james-peter-hill" title="Referee's report by Adam Sedgwick, on a paper 'Observations on the development of ornithoryhnchus' by James Thomas Wilson and James Peter Hill" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
II. Observations on the development of ornithorhynchus External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 1st January 1908
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1908.0002
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Sidney Frederic Harmer, on a paper 'Observations on the development of ornithorhynchus' by James Thomas Wilson and James Peter Hill
Creator: Sidney Frederic Harmer Reference number: RR/16/407
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 16, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1903-1906 Reference number: RR/16
Related Fellows
-
James Peter Hill
Author -
Adam Sedgwick
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1949
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection