Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in full in Philosophical Transactions. Suggests the shorthand symbols used should be collected in one page for easy reference. The general method of the paper and the cases to which it is applied should be referred to more fully in the preface. The condensations suggested by Burnside in his report, should be submitted to the author for approval and incorporation. Provides general remarks on additional paper. In recommending this paper for publication he has been to some extent influenced by the favourable opinion expressed by Professor [William] Burnside, to whom he submitted the paper according to agreement. Burnside's remarks are forwarded herewith [not attached] and should be sent to the author. Agree's with Burnside as to the success of the work on the foundations of geometry but thinks the method of procedure adopted is expected to be more useful as a means physical research or at all events, of suggestion in physics.

The author has so far only reached the expression of kinematical ideas and this is difficult to follow. He is inclined to think that the method, though useful in a subject like geometry, will not be of much service to physics which depends upon inductive processes. Thinks the paper not easy for the general reader due to the many new definitions and axioms, and a system of shorthand containing at least a hundred symbols. Suggests the symbols be collected in one page for ready reference and that in the early stages of their use more assistance is afforded to the reader. The preface as it stands seems hardly suitable for the usual abstract but the paper is of a kind that makes it difficult to write shortly of it.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1906].

Endorsed on verso as received 29 November 1905.

Reference number
RR/16/401
Earliest possible date
27 November 1905
Physical description
Standardised form (type A) and note on paper
Page extent
6 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Davidson Niven

View page for William Davidson Niven

Use this record

Citation

William Davidson Niven, Referee's report by William Davidson Niven, on a paper 'Mathematical concepts of the material world' by Alfred North Whitehead, 27 November 1905, RR/16/401, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_401/referees-report-by-william-davidson-niven-on-a-paper-mathematical-concepts-of-the-material-world-by-alfred-north-whitehead, accessed on 20 April 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_401/referees-report-by-william-davidson-niven-on-a-paper-mathematical-concepts-of-the-material-world-by-alfred-north-whitehead" title="Referee's report by William Davidson Niven, on a paper 'Mathematical concepts of the material world' by Alfred North Whitehead" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection