Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Not recommended for publication in Proceedings. The author is simply calling attention to some of his own observations made some time ago and published in another journal. There is no new fact or observations. The paper is of the nature of a criticism. It is quite reasonable of the author to call attention to his earlier observations but he hardly thinks that the Proceedings is the place for this, unless in connection with new observations.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 15 December 1905.

Reference number
RR/16/369
Earliest possible date
14 December 1905
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Adam Sedgwick

View page for Adam Sedgwick

Use this record

Citation

Adam Sedgwick, Referee's report by Adam Sedgwick, on a paper 'Note on a flagellate parasite found in culex fatigans' by Ronald Ross, 14 December 1905, RR/16/369, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_369/referees-report-by-adam-sedgwick-on-a-paper-note-on-a-flagellate-parasite-found-in-culex-fatigans-by-ronald-ross, accessed on 07 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_369/referees-report-by-adam-sedgwick-on-a-paper-note-on-a-flagellate-parasite-found-in-culex-fatigans-by-ronald-ross" title="Referee's report by Adam Sedgwick, on a paper 'Note on a flagellate parasite found in culex fatigans' by Ronald Ross" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection