Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

The paper is not suitable for the Royal Society. It contains no new observation and he cannot find anything of value in the author's treatment. The author's acquaintance with the various phenomena discussed is evidently of a superficial and hearsay character. This essay belongs to a type which had a certain vogue 30 years ago, but is now rightly discredited.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 6 October 1905.

Reference number
RR/16/367
Earliest possible date
05 October 1905
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Bateson

View page for William Bateson

Use this record

Citation

William Bateson, Referee's report by William Bateson, on a paper 'The function of sex' by G Archdall Reid, 05 October 1905, RR/16/367, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_367/referees-report-by-william-bateson-on-a-paper-the-function-of-sex-by-g-archdall-reid, accessed on 15 December 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_367/referees-report-by-william-bateson-on-a-paper-the-function-of-sex-by-g-archdall-reid" title="Referee's report by William Bateson, on a paper 'The function of sex' by G Archdall Reid" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection