Memoranda from The Royal Society, and reply from William Dobinson Halliburton, on a paper 'Contribution to the physiology of mammalian reproduction' by Francis Hugh Adam Marshall and William A Jolly
Reference number: RR/16/349
Date: 18 July 1905
Description
The manuscript of the paper was returned to the authors with a copy of the first referee's suggestions as to abbreviation et cetera. The manuscript has been returned with some of the suggestions carried out. The authors state that after careful consideration they have been unable to devise tables in which to summarise some of the facts. The first referee's report is enclosed for the Chairman's information. D J Cunningham, the second referee, suggested no modifications in the text but thought four illustrations might be slightly reduced, the others however would not bear reduction. Asks if the printing of the paper in the Philosophical Transactions may proceed.
In a reply dates 19 July Halliburton comments on the various points made in the memoranda and concludes that they can proceed with printing in the Transactions.
[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1906].
- Reference number
- RR/16/349
- Earliest possible date
- 18 July 1905
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type B)
- Page extent
- 1 page
- Format
- Typescript
Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
William Dobinson Halliburton, Memoranda from The Royal Society, and reply from William Dobinson Halliburton, on a paper 'Contribution to the physiology of mammalian reproduction' by Francis Hugh Adam Marshall and William A Jolly, 18 July 1905, RR/16/349, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_349/memoranda-from-the-royal-society-and-reply-from-william-dobinson-halliburton-on-a-paper-contribution-to-the-physiology-of-mammalian-reproduction-by-francis-hugh-adam-marshall-and-william-a-jolly, accessed on 13 January 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_349/memoranda-from-the-royal-society-and-reply-from-william-dobinson-halliburton-on-a-paper-contribution-to-the-physiology-of-mammalian-reproduction-by-francis-hugh-adam-marshall-and-william-a-jolly
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_349/memoranda-from-the-royal-society-and-reply-from-william-dobinson-halliburton-on-a-paper-contribution-to-the-physiology-of-mammalian-reproduction-by-francis-hugh-adam-marshall-and-william-a-jolly" title="Memoranda from The Royal Society, and reply from William Dobinson Halliburton, on a paper 'Contribution to the physiology of mammalian reproduction' by Francis Hugh Adam Marshall and William A Jolly" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
V. Contributions to the physiology of mammalian reproduction. Part I.—The œstrous cycle in the dog. Part II.—The ovary as an organ of internal secretion External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 1st January 1906
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1906.0005
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Daniel John Cunningham, on a paper 'Contributions to the physiology of mammalian reproduction. Parts I & II.' by Francis Hugh Adam Marshall and W A Jolly
Creator: Daniel John Cunningham Reference number: RR/16/348 -
Referee's report by Ernest Henry Starling, on a paper 'Contributions to the physiology of mammalian reproduction. Part I. the oestrous cycle in the dog. Part II The ovary as an organ of internal secretion' by Francis Hugh Adam Marshall and William A Jolly
Creator: Ernest Henry Starling Reference number: RR/16/347
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 16, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1903-1906 Reference number: RR/16
Related Fellows
-
Francis Hugh Adam Marshall
Author -
William Dobinson Halliburton
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection