Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society' as it is quite unsuitable. The paper describes a vast amount of experimental work but without any new principle or reaction being established, and without anything being definitely proved beyond question.

Recorded in register of papers as archived.

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 10 June 1903.

Reference number
RR/16/32
Earliest possible date
10 June 1903
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Wyndham Rowland Dunstan

View page for Wyndham Rowland Dunstan

Use this record

Citation

Wyndham Rowland Dunstan, Referee's report by Wyndham Roland Dunstan, on a paper 'A study of the interaction of Mercury and Nitric Acid' by P Chandra, 10 June 1903, RR/16/32, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_32/referees-report-by-wyndham-roland-dunstan-on-a-paper-a-study-of-the-interaction-of-mercury-and-nitric-acid-by-p-chandra, accessed on 25 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_32/referees-report-by-wyndham-roland-dunstan-on-a-paper-a-study-of-the-interaction-of-mercury-and-nitric-acid-by-p-chandra" title="Referee's report by Wyndham Roland Dunstan, on a paper 'A study of the interaction of Mercury and Nitric Acid' by P Chandra" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection