Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, subject to a revision of the nomenclature. All the illustrations should be reproduced. Explains how the author's misunderstanding of the nomenclature has led them to give an entirely wrong impression as to the relation between the plant forms compared.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1905].

Endorsed on verso as received 16 May 1905.

Reference number
RR/16/297
Earliest possible date
13 May 1905
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Dukinfield Henry Scott

View page for Dukinfield Henry Scott

Use this record

Citation

Dukinfield Henry Scott, Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'On the cytology of apogamy & apospory. II. preliminary note on apospory' by L Digby, 13 May 1905, RR/16/297, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_297/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-on-the-cytology-of-apogamy-apospory-ii-preliminary-note-on-apospory-by-l-digby, accessed on 06 December 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_297/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-on-the-cytology-of-apogamy-apospory-ii-preliminary-note-on-apospory-by-l-digby" title="Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'On the cytology of apogamy & apospory. II. preliminary note on apospory' by L Digby" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection