Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Proceedings as it stands. It is an excellent piece of work on a most interesting and difficult subject.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1940].

Endorsed on verso as received 4 November 1905.

Reference number
RR/16/296
Earliest possible date
November 1905
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Edward Thorpe

View page for Thomas Edward Thorpe

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Edward Thorpe, Referee's report by Thomas Edward Thorpe, on a paper 'The physical and chemical properties of iron carbonyl' by Sir James Dewar and Humphrey Owen Jones, November 1905, RR/16/296, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_296/referees-report-by-thomas-edward-thorpe-on-a-paper-the-physical-and-chemical-properties-of-iron-carbonyl-by-sir-james-dewar-and-humphrey-owen-jones, accessed on 13 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_296/referees-report-by-thomas-edward-thorpe-on-a-paper-the-physical-and-chemical-properties-of-iron-carbonyl-by-sir-james-dewar-and-humphrey-owen-jones" title="Referee's report by Thomas Edward Thorpe, on a paper 'The physical and chemical properties of iron carbonyl' by Sir James Dewar and Humphrey Owen Jones" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection