Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

The paper is of a controversial nature and discusses observations recorded in a paper by H M Reese, 'Astrophysical Journal', June, 1904. Newall thinks much of Baxandall's criticism of Reese justified but does not recommend the publication of the paper in Proceedings. The criticisms are lengthy and some of them can hardly be accepted as fair. It appears that there have been accidental omissions in a previous paper by Sir N Lockyer, 'Proceedings of the Royal Society', 65, page 452, and Newall wonders if it would be best to put the omissions on record. Otherwise it seems this paper might be sent to the editors of the 'Astrophyical Journal' for their consideration.

The plate accompanying the paper was broken when it reached Newall.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 30 January 1905.

Reference number
RR/16/265
Earliest possible date
29 January 1905
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Hugh Frank Newall

View page for Hugh Frank Newall

Use this record

Citation

Hugh Frank Newall, Referee's report by Hugh Frank Newall, on a paper 'On the enhanced lines of iron, titanium and nickel' by Frank E Baxandall, 29 January 1905, RR/16/265, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_265/referees-report-by-hugh-frank-newall-on-a-paper-on-the-enhanced-lines-of-iron-titanium-and-nickel-by-frank-e-baxandall, accessed on 20 March 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_265/referees-report-by-hugh-frank-newall-on-a-paper-on-the-enhanced-lines-of-iron-titanium-and-nickel-by-frank-e-baxandall" title="Referee's report by Hugh Frank Newall, on a paper 'On the enhanced lines of iron, titanium and nickel' by Frank E Baxandall" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection