Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Geology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. Thinks the restored outline of Hyperodapedon should be given in the text and also the two outlines of Stenoscrotopon[?], but the latter reduced in size. The sketches of three plates might well be put on two plates. The photographs do not show the fossils clearly and it is to be feared that the reproductions will be less clear. There is no description of the plates.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions B, 1904]

Endorsed on verso as received 29 May 1903.

Reference number
RR/16/24
Earliest possible date
29 May 1903
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Tulley Newton

View page for Edwin Tulley Newton

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Tulley Newton, Referee's report by Edwin Tulley Newton, on a paper 'Reptilian remains from the Trias of Elgin' by George Albert Boulenger, 29 May 1903, RR/16/24, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_24/referees-report-by-edwin-tulley-newton-on-a-paper-reptilian-remains-from-the-trias-of-elgin-by-george-albert-boulenger, accessed on 18 March 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_24/referees-report-by-edwin-tulley-newton-on-a-paper-reptilian-remains-from-the-trias-of-elgin-by-george-albert-boulenger" title="Referee's report by Edwin Tulley Newton, on a paper 'Reptilian remains from the Trias of Elgin' by George Albert Boulenger" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection