Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: [Physics and chemistry]

There is practically no difference between Darwin's opinion of Oldham's paper and Lamb's own opinion. Notes that Darwin's previous calculations seem absolutely to exclude a tidal influence on earthquakes a priori. He must now withdraw his recommendation that the paper be printed in the Philosophical Transactions. At the same time he adheres to the opinion to which Darwin agrees, that the paper is entitled to publication somewhere.

If the title is modified as Darwin suggests, he does not see why the paper might not appear in the Proceedings, if it is not judged too long. In that case Darwin's report should be communicated to the author to enable him to make modifications. If a third referee is required, he thinks [Charles] Chree very suitable.

[Not published]

Endorsed on recto as received 4 June 1904.

Reference number
RR/16/219
Earliest possible date
03 June 1904
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Horace Lamb

View page for Horace Lamb

Use this record

Citation

Horace Lamb, Second referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'The seismic effect of tidal stresses' by Richard Dixon Oldham, 03 June 1904, RR/16/219, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_219/second-referees-report-by-horace-lamb-on-a-paper-the-seismic-effect-of-tidal-stresses-by-richard-dixon-oldham, accessed on 09 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_219/second-referees-report-by-horace-lamb-on-a-paper-the-seismic-effect-of-tidal-stresses-by-richard-dixon-oldham" title="Second referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'The seismic effect of tidal stresses' by Richard Dixon Oldham" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection