Referee's report by Albert Charles Seward, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members. No. V. general comparisons and conclusion' by Professor Frederick Orpen Bower
Reference number: RR/16/21
Date: 17 February 1903
Description
Sectional Committee: Botany
Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. Finds the memoir not a record of unpublished facts but a summary and a critical discussion of previously recorded facts. The absence of new discoveries need not in itself preclude publication in Philosophical Transactions. The current great length and arrangement of the paper leads to considerable repetition. This together with the consideration that the memoir is chiefly concerned with the elaboration of a theory previously stated in outline, and with a discussion as to the bearing of facts already recorded, leads him to think the paper is unsuitable for publication in the Transactions. As a general statement of the author's conclusions the abstract already in print appears to him to be adequate, whereas the complete memoir is more suitable for publication in some other form than as a Transactions paper.
[Published in the Philosophical Transactions B, 1904].
Endorsed on verso as received 19 February 1903.
- Reference number
- RR/16/21
- Earliest possible date
- 17 February 1903
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type A)
- Page extent
- 4 pages
- Format
- Typescript
Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Albert Charles Seward, Referee's report by Albert Charles Seward, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members. No. V. general comparisons and conclusion' by Professor Frederick Orpen Bower, 17 February 1903, RR/16/21, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_21/referees-report-by-albert-charles-seward-on-a-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-members-no-v-general-comparisons-and-conclusion-by-professor-frederick-orpen-bower, accessed on 14 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_21/referees-report-by-albert-charles-seward-on-a-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-members-no-v-general-comparisons-and-conclusion-by-professor-frederick-orpen-bower
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_21/referees-report-by-albert-charles-seward-on-a-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-members-no-v-general-comparisons-and-conclusion-by-professor-frederick-orpen-bower" title="Referee's report by Albert Charles Seward, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members. No. V. general comparisons and conclusion' by Professor Frederick Orpen Bower" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
VII.—Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members.—No. V. General comparisons and conculsion External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 1st January 1904
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1904.0007
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Isaac Bayley Balfour, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members. No. V. general comparisons and conclusion' by Professor Frederick Orpen Bower
Creator: Isaac Bayley Balfour Reference number: RR/16/22 -
Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members. No. V. general comparisons and conclusion' by Professor Frederick Orpen Bower
Creator: Dukinfield Henry Scott Reference number: RR/16/23
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 16, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1903-1906 Reference number: RR/16
Related Fellows
-
Albert Charles Seward
Referee -
Frederick Orpen Bower
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection