Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, if published it should appear in Proceedings. The fact not fully represented in the published abstract is [that it is] mainly an account of other papers therein with running criticisms. Modifications are not discussed. Not more than six or eight, if any of the illustrations should be reproduced. The illustrations seem unfitted for reproduction without much trouble and expense. On comparing the two sets of illustrations Larmor does not see any evidence of similarity in the two classes of phenomena. He would not think of comparing them. The paper itself is very well written. The description of the devices to imitate cell phenomena carry no conviction whatever. The three page abstract in the Proceedings practically contains the whole matter and is quite intelligible and covers all that the author has to say. An appended letter from Francis Darwin to Joseph Larmor is dated 6 February 1905 and addressed from the Royal Society, Burlington House. Darwin states that he would be inclined to give Hartog a diagram for the sake of the ignorant biologist. Annotated in reply by Larmor who notes that if it is decided that a 'Proceedings' abstract is sufficient, it would be an improvement to allow the author say four diagrams, to be chosen by the author.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1905].

Endorsed as received 7 February 1905.

Reference number
RR/16/193
Earliest possible date
04 February 1905
Physical description
Standardised form (type A) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Joseph Larmor

View page for Joseph Larmor

Use this record

Citation

Joseph Larmor, Referee's report by Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog, 04 February 1905, RR/16/193, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_193/referees-report-by-joseph-larmor-on-a-paper-the-dual-force-of-the-dividing-cell-part-i-the-achromatic-spindle-figure-elucidated-by-magnetic-chains-of-force-by-marcus-hartog, accessed on 09 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_193/referees-report-by-joseph-larmor-on-a-paper-the-dual-force-of-the-dividing-cell-part-i-the-achromatic-spindle-figure-elucidated-by-magnetic-chains-of-force-by-marcus-hartog" title="Referee's report by Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection