Referee's report by Horace Tabberer Brown, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog
Reference number: RR/16/192
Date: 19 January 1905
Description
Sectional Committee: [Botany]
No clear statement regarding publication in Philosophical Transactions. Has read Hartog's paper but regrets to say that his knowledge of the fundamental biological and physical phenomena of which it treats is too slender for him to undertake the important duties of a referee. The general impression left on his mind is that the paper demonstrates some most remarkable analysis between the phenomena of karyokinesis and those induced by magnetic models, and that due weight will have to be given by cytologists to the facts here recorded, which are certainly suggestive of the existence of a dual force in the dividing cell.
[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1905].
Endorsed on recto as received 20 January 1905.
- Reference number
- RR/16/192
- Earliest possible date
- 19 January 1905
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 2 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Horace Tabberer Brown, Referee's report by Horace Tabberer Brown, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog, 19 January 1905, RR/16/192, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_192/referees-report-by-horace-tabberer-brown-on-a-paper-the-dual-force-of-the-dividing-cell-part-i-the-achromatic-spindle-figure-elucidated-by-magnetic-chains-of-force-by-marcus-hartog, accessed on 05 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_192/referees-report-by-horace-tabberer-brown-on-a-paper-the-dual-force-of-the-dividing-cell-part-i-the-achromatic-spindle-figure-elucidated-by-magnetic-chains-of-force-by-marcus-hartog
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_192/referees-report-by-horace-tabberer-brown-on-a-paper-the-dual-force-of-the-dividing-cell-part-i-the-achromatic-spindle-figure-elucidated-by-magnetic-chains-of-force-by-marcus-hartog" title="Referee's report by Horace Tabberer Brown, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I: The achromatic spindle figure illustrated by magnetic chains of force External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 9th November 1905
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1905.0047
Related Records
-
Referee's report by John Bretland Farmer, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog
Creator: John Bretland Farmer Reference number: RR/16/190 -
Referee's report by Harold William Taylor Wager, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog
Creator: Harold William Taylor Wager Reference number: RR/16/191 -
Referee's report by Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'The dual force of the dividing cell. Part I. The Achromatic Spindle Figure, elucidated by magnetic chains of force' by Marcus Hartog
Creator: Joseph Larmor Reference number: RR/16/193
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 16, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1903-1906 Reference number: RR/16
Related Fellows
-
Horace Tabberer Brown
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection