Referee's report by John Bretland Farmer, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon
Reference number: RR/16/103
Date: February 1904
Description
Sectional Committee: Botany
No clear statement regarding publication. Is somewhat doubtful whether this paper should be published in Philosophical Transactions, and it should not be published in its present form. If published the speculations respecting what the author terms 'specializing' and 'generalizing' factors, might be greatly curtailed as they seem to posses very little value. There are no illustrations. The paper does not appear to represent much advance in knowledge. The existence of 'Biological forms' is recognised already, the infections resulting after the legion are not very surprising, and the general summary is largely devoted to hypothesis that need much testing before they deserve acceptance.
In a separate report Farmer notes that the results though interesting do not appear to point very conclusively towards the solution of problems already raised by others. Suggests an additional experiment. Cultural conditions are known to affect a very large number of fungi and bacteria, and the facts brought forward in the paper to show the 'biologic-form' character and the relative ease with which these can be obliterated, hardly appear of sufficient importance to appear in the 'Transactions'. If the author can ascertain more definitely anything about the nature of the substances concerned in promoting or inhibiting growth respectively, he will then have made a distinct step in the advancement of natural knowledge.
[Published in the Philosophical Transactions B, 1905].
Endorsed on verso as received 3 February 1904.
- Reference number
- RR/16/103
- Earliest possible date
- February 1904
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type A) and letter on paper
- Page extent
- 3 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
John Bretland Farmer, Referee's report by John Bretland Farmer, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon, February 1904, RR/16/103, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_103/referees-report-by-john-bretland-farmer-on-a-paper-cultural-experiments-with-biologic-forms-of-the-erysiphaceae-by-ernest-s-salmon, accessed on 15 January 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_103/referees-report-by-john-bretland-farmer-on-a-paper-cultural-experiments-with-biologic-forms-of-the-erysiphaceae-by-ernest-s-salmon
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_103/referees-report-by-john-bretland-farmer-on-a-paper-cultural-experiments-with-biologic-forms-of-the-erysiphaceae-by-ernest-s-salmon" title="Referee's report by John Bretland Farmer, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
V. Cultural experiments with "biologic forms" of the erysiphaceæ External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 1st January 1905
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1905.0006
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Francis Darwin, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon
Creator: Francis Darwin Reference number: RR/16/101 -
Referee's report by George Robert Milne Murray, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon
Creator: George Robert Milne Murray Reference number: RR/16/102
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 16, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1903-1906 Reference number: RR/16
Related Fellows
-
John Bretland Farmer
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection