Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the Philosophical Transactions. It may be printed in Proceedings, though he has some hesitation in recommending any publication of physiological species.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions B, 1905]

Endorsed on verso as received 20 January 1904.

Reference number
RR/16/102
Earliest possible date
January 1904
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Robert Milne Murray

View page for George Robert Milne Murray

Use this record

Citation

George Robert Milne Murray, Referee's report by George Robert Milne Murray, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon, January 1904, RR/16/102, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_102/referees-report-by-george-robert-milne-murray-on-a-paper-cultural-experiments-with-biologic-forms-of-the-erysiphaceae-by-ernest-s-salmon, accessed on 13 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_102/referees-report-by-george-robert-milne-murray-on-a-paper-cultural-experiments-with-biologic-forms-of-the-erysiphaceae-by-ernest-s-salmon" title="Referee's report by George Robert Milne Murray, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection