Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The results are important and interesting. The paper would be improved by the omission of the author's hypothesis as to how injury alters the susceptibility of a leaf. There is no evidence for the hypotheses, and if retained it should be more briefly and tentatively given.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions B, 1905].

Endorsed on verso as received 21 December 1903.

Reference number
RR/16/101
Earliest possible date
December 1903
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Francis Darwin

View page for Francis Darwin

Use this record

Citation

Francis Darwin, Referee's report by Francis Darwin, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon, December 1903, RR/16/101, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_16_101/referees-report-by-francis-darwin-on-a-paper-cultural-experiments-with-biologic-forms-of-the-erysiphaceae-by-ernest-s-salmon, accessed on 13 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_16_101/referees-report-by-francis-darwin-on-a-paper-cultural-experiments-with-biologic-forms-of-the-erysiphaceae-by-ernest-s-salmon" title="Referee's report by Francis Darwin, on a paper 'Cultural experiments with 'Biologic Forms' of the Erysiphaceae' by Ernest S Salmon" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection