Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics and chemistry

The Committee should defer publication until the complete results of the expedition have been handed in. The paper does not contain the results of the principal instruments; prismatic cameras, taken out by the expedition. Some observations of shadow bands are of interest but the results have already been published in abstract in the Proceedings.

When declaring his willingness to act as a referee to this paper, he did so under the impression that this would only prove to be a matter of form and that the results of an important expedition should, as a matter of course, be printed in the Transactions. If he is obliged to make a different recommendation it is under the strong conviction that it is not to the credit of the Society or the Eclipse Expedition that the minor observations should be put together and printed separately, while the chief results of the expedition are reserved for subsequent publication. There is nothing in the paper which cannot wait until the results of the prismatic camera have been handed in. Efforts should be made as soon as possible to obtain the results of the prismatic cameras. Should the delay be too great, his judgement as to deferring the paper might be modified.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1901].

Endorsed on verso as received 12 March 1900.

Reference number
RR/15/81
Earliest possible date
March 1900
Physical description
Standardised form (type A) and note on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Schuster

View page for Arthur Schuster

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Schuster, Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'Total eclipse of the sun, January 22, 1898, observations at Visiadrug' by Joseph Norman Lockyer, Captain Chisholm-Batten and Alexander Pedler, March 1900, RR/15/81, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_81/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-total-eclipse-of-the-sun-january-22-1898-observations-at-visiadrug-by-joseph-norman-lockyer-captain-chisholm-batten-and-alexander-pedler, accessed on 23 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_81/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-total-eclipse-of-the-sun-january-22-1898-observations-at-visiadrug-by-joseph-norman-lockyer-captain-chisholm-batten-and-alexander-pedler" title="Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'Total eclipse of the sun, January 22, 1898, observations at Visiadrug' by Joseph Norman Lockyer, Captain Chisholm-Batten and Alexander Pedler" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection