Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: not stated

He returns the paper and has found it difficult to express an opinion on the work. In the present paper the results are so briefly described that the value of the paper is far less than it could have been. He regrets the attempt to formulate conclusions which the experiments alluded to fail to prove. One of the most important suggestions made is that if two varieties of an organism are crossed the prepotency of one or the other parent depends in large part on the relative age of germ cells at the moment of fertilisation. This 'extremley valuable' suggestion ought to serve as the starting point for a whole series of experiments, however the author's results as described do not go far towards proving the truth of the statement.

Regarding the crossing experiments related to rabbit colour the results are not given in such a form that the various conclusions drawn from them can be in any way tested.

Cannot see anything in this present paper which could justify its publication at all. A detailed account of the experiments briefly referred to would be of very great value. Is increasingly convinced that the only way to reach safe conclusions concerning heredity is the way pointed out by Francis Galton. Until each question raised by Ewart's work can be settled by reference to a statistically large number of experiments, any attempt to draw general conclusions is premature. Few have had the courage to even begin such experiments. If Ewart could be induced to publish a detailed description of his experiments he would confer a great benefit upon the biological sciences and would stimulate others.

[Not published].

Endorsed on recto as received 1 May 1900.

Reference number
RR/15/50
Earliest possible date
29 April 1900
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Walter Frank Raphael Weldon

View page for Walter Frank Raphael Weldon

Use this record

Citation

Walter Frank Raphael Weldon, Referee's report by Walter Frank Raphael Weldon, on a paper 'Variation' by James Cossar Ewart, 29 April 1900, RR/15/50, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_50/referees-report-by-walter-frank-raphael-weldon-on-a-paper-variation-by-james-cossar-ewart, accessed on 12 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_50/referees-report-by-walter-frank-raphael-weldon-on-a-paper-variation-by-james-cossar-ewart" title="Referee's report by Walter Frank Raphael Weldon, on a paper 'Variation' by James Cossar Ewart" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection