Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: not stated

Has sent Larmor a reply to the criticisms of his referee's from Paris having been under the impression that the committee of publication had met last week. Having now returned to London and with a library at his disposal, he asks Larmor to returns his remarks for a few days so that he may make his reply to the criticisms absolutely exact. He will also have his reply type written to save the committee time in going through it.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1902].

Endorsed on recto as received 23 April 1902.

Reference number
RR/15/406
Earliest possible date
23 April 1902
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Use this record

Citation

Fourth letter from Meyer Wilderman, on his paper 'Chemical dynamics and statics in light' to Joseph Larmor, 23 April 1902, RR/15/406, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_406/fourth-letter-from-meyer-wilderman-on-his-paper-chemical-dynamics-and-statics-in-light-to-joseph-larmor, accessed on 10 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_406/fourth-letter-from-meyer-wilderman-on-his-paper-chemical-dynamics-and-statics-in-light-to-joseph-larmor" title="Fourth letter from Meyer Wilderman, on his paper 'Chemical dynamics and statics in light' to Joseph Larmor" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection