Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Memoranda from Robert William Frederick Harrison, and reply from William Dobinson Halliburton and Francis Gotch, on a paper 'The decline of the injury current in mammalian nerve, and its modification by changes of temperature' by Sowton and John Smyth Macdonald

Reference number: RR/15/388

Date: 19 December 1902

Description

Sectional committee: not stated

Harrison thinks the length of the above mentioned paper greatly exceeds the length of a short paper for the Proceedings. Asks if Gotch thinks the attention of the author's should be drawn to this or whether the paper had better wait for a meeting of the Physiology Committee. Halliburton replies [undated] that the paper should be sent to him, he will then be able to judge better.

Halliburton replies on 20 December that the paper does not appear capable of being shortened. Sherrington and the authors should be communicated with and told that the paper will be considered to have been submitted for Philosophical Transactions. If they agree, a short abstract will be required. Halliburton suggests Dr Waller and Professor Gotch as referees. Another note from Harrison [undated] states that having been consulted, Sherrington expressed decided preference for [publication in] the Proceedings.

A final note is provided by Professor Gotch, dated 15th January 1903. The paper would actually take up at most eight pages of the Proceedings but there are in manuscript 25 pages of tables. Gotch does not think these need to be reproduced and explains why he does not think they actually strengthen the author's argument. Suggests the tables be omitted and the paper published in the Proceedings. Does not consider it necessary to publish all the illustrations, and suggests the author selects four or five. Does not consider the paper as it stands, suitable for publication in the Philosophical Transactions.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1902].

Endorsed on recto as received 16 January 1903.

Reference number
RR/15/388
Earliest possible date
19 December 1902
Physical description
Memorandum on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator names

William Dobinson Halliburton

View page for William Dobinson Halliburton

Francis Gotch

View page for Francis Gotch

Use this record

Citation

William Dobinson Halliburton, Francis Gotch, Memoranda from Robert William Frederick Harrison, and reply from William Dobinson Halliburton and Francis Gotch, on a paper 'The decline of the injury current in mammalian nerve, and its modification by changes of temperature' by Sowton and John Smyth Macdonald, 19 December 1902, RR/15/388, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_388/memoranda-from-robert-william-frederick-harrison-and-reply-from-william-dobinson-halliburton-and-francis-gotch-on-a-paper-the-decline-of-the-injury-current-in-mammalian-nerve-and-its-modification-by-changes-of-temperature-by-sowton-and-john-smyth-macdonald, accessed on 02 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_388/memoranda-from-robert-william-frederick-harrison-and-reply-from-william-dobinson-halliburton-and-francis-gotch-on-a-paper-the-decline-of-the-injury-current-in-mammalian-nerve-and-its-modification-by-changes-of-temperature-by-sowton-and-john-smyth-macdonald" title="Memoranda from Robert William Frederick Harrison, and reply from William Dobinson Halliburton and Francis Gotch, on a paper 'The decline of the injury current in mammalian nerve, and its modification by changes of temperature' by Sowton and John Smyth Macdonald" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection