Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The sub-mechanics of the universe' by Osborne Reynolds
Reference number: RR/15/373
Date: 09 April 1902

Description
Sectional Committee: Mathematics
Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, in its present form. If the parts concerned with the extension of the kinetic theory of gases could be separated from the rest, and written in a form independent of the speculative parts of the paper, they might be recommended for publication. The extensions of the kinetic theory are mixed with a theory of 'mean and relative' motion and a theory of the constitution of the primordial medium described as 'granular'. If the paper is modified as suggested the question of diagrams will arise again. If the paper is published without substantial change the diagrams may stand. The parts of the paper dealing with the theory of 'mean and relative' motions as very imperfect and speculative. He is not sufficiently familiar with the kinetic theory of gases to criticise the proposed extension effectively but it appears to include a real advance, as it is concerned with the case where the diameters of the molecules are not very small compared with the free paths, and thus makes a definite step in the molecular theory of liquids and solids.
Criticises the paper under the following section headings: mean and relative motion; kinetic theory for a finite ratio of diameters to free paths; theory of the primordial medium; explanation of the physical evidence by means of the granular medium. He has written his report without paying any regard to the eminence of the writer or his past services to physical science, or any question of policy. If it is thought that the record of the author's speculations is in itself a desirable thing, then before it is published, the detailed criticisms in his appendix might be submitted to the author.
[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1901].
Endorsed on verso as received 14 April 1902.
- Reference number
- RR/15/373
- Earliest possible date
- 09 April 1902
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type A) and notes on paper
- Page extent
- 10 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Augustus Edward Hough Love, Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The sub-mechanics of the universe' by Osborne Reynolds, 09 April 1902, RR/15/373, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_373/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-a-paper-the-sub-mechanics-of-the-universe-by-osborne-reynolds, accessed on 09 February 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_373/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-a-paper-the-sub-mechanics-of-the-universe-by-osborne-reynolds
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_373/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-a-paper-the-sub-mechanics-of-the-universe-by-osborne-reynolds" title="Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The sub-mechanics of the universe' by Osborne Reynolds" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
On the sub-mechanics of the Universe External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 4th April 1902
DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1901.0127
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'The sub-mechanics of the universe' by Osborne Reynolds
Creator: Joseph Larmor Reference number: RR/15/374
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 15, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1900-1902 Reference number: RR/15
Related Fellows
-
Augustus Edward Hough Love
Referee -
Osborne Reynolds
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection