Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. Describes a small modification he would recommend for the structure of table one. In general thinks the wave-lengths of the chromospheric lines given in table one are extremely accurate.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1901].

Endorsed on verso as received 29 January 1902.

Reference number
RR/15/328
Earliest possible date
January 1903
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frank Watson Dyson

View page for Frank Watson Dyson

Use this record

Citation

Frank Watson Dyson, Referee's report by Frank Watson Dyson, on a paper 'Solar eclipse of 1900, May 28th. General discussion of spectroscopic results' by John Evershed, January 1903, RR/15/328, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_328/referees-report-by-frank-watson-dyson-on-a-paper-solar-eclipse-of-1900-may-28th-general-discussion-of-spectroscopic-results-by-john-evershed, accessed on 23 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_328/referees-report-by-frank-watson-dyson-on-a-paper-solar-eclipse-of-1900-may-28th-general-discussion-of-spectroscopic-results-by-john-evershed" title="Referee's report by Frank Watson Dyson, on a paper 'Solar eclipse of 1900, May 28th. General discussion of spectroscopic results' by John Evershed" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection