Referee's report by William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'The structure and affinities of dipteris, with notes on the geological history of the dipteridinae' by Albert Charles Seward and Elizabeth Dale
Reference number: RR/15/254
Date: 10 June 1901
Description
Sectional Committee: Botany
Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, in full subject to the suggestions he makes. The illustrations should if possible be amplified by some illustrations of allied extinct forms. All the illustrations should be reproduced. Notes that Dipteris and Matonia are two anomalous but associated genera which have long attracted the attention of botanists. A detailed study of their structure is the more desirable as they have hitherto proved extremely [?] in cultivation. The authors have 'probably correctly' separated Dipteris from Polypodiaceae. The paper should be published with all its illustrations as it stands.Although, it might be more accessible to botanists if published in the Transactions of the Linnean Society' than in Philosophical Transactions. The paper would carry more conviction if the authors saw their way to support their position by figuring some mesozoic ferns for comparison with the Dipteris.
[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1901].
Endorsed on verso as received 11 June 1901.
- Reference number
- RR/15/254
- Earliest possible date
- 10 June 1901
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type A) and note on paper
- Page extent
- 4 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, Referee's report by William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'The structure and affinities of dipteris, with notes on the geological history of the dipteridinae' by Albert Charles Seward and Elizabeth Dale, 10 June 1901, RR/15/254, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_254/referees-report-by-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-the-structure-and-affinities-of-dipteris-with-notes-on-the-geological-history-of-the-dipteridinae-by-albert-charles-seward-and-elizabeth-dale, accessed on 16 January 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_254/referees-report-by-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-the-structure-and-affinities-of-dipteris-with-notes-on-the-geological-history-of-the-dipteridinae-by-albert-charles-seward-and-elizabeth-dale
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_254/referees-report-by-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-the-structure-and-affinities-of-dipteris-with-notes-on-the-geological-history-of-the-dipteridinae-by-albert-charles-seward-and-elizabeth-dale" title="Referee's report by William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'The structure and affinities of dipteris, with notes on the geological history of the dipteridinae' by Albert Charles Seward and Elizabeth Dale" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
X. On the structure and affinities of dipteris , with notes on the geological history of the dipteridinæ External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 1st January 1901
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1901.0011
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'The structure and affinities of dipteris, with notes on the geological history of the dipteridinae' by Albert Charles Seward and Elizabeth Dale
Creator: Dukinfield Henry Scott Reference number: RR/15/253
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 15, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1900-1902 Reference number: RR/15
Related Fellows
-
William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Referee -
Albert Charles Seward
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection