Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The stability of the spherical nebula' by James Hopwood Jeans
Reference number: RR/15/200
Date: 31 July 1901
Description
Sectional Committee: Mathematics
Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions provided it can be modified as indicated in the following report and notes. It is necessary to present the fundamental equations in a form admitting of comparison with those used by previous writers, primarily Kirchhoff in 'Vorlesangen über die Theorie der Wärme', Leipzig 1894. Cannot get the authors equations from those 'usually taken', and does not find the authors investigation convincing. If there is error in the equations, it will be necessary after correcting them to determine whether any of the subsequent work needs alteration and probably many details will need to be corrected. The single illustration should be reproduced provided the theory leading to it is not found to be vitiated.
The object of the paper is to throw light on some problems of speculative astronomy by the solution of definite problems of mathematical physics. It is ably worked out and is probably substantially correct but the statement of the definite problems is not sufficiently clear and the equations, which are taken to represent them analytically, are liable to criticism. He was unable to get the authors equation number 13 from Kirchoff's equations. He also thinks the 'boundary-condition' requires attention and discusses a quotation on page 14 of the Jean's manuscript by Boltzman from 'Vorlesungen über Gastheorie'.
[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1902].
Endorsed on verso as received 1 August 1901.
- Reference number
- RR/15/200
- Earliest possible date
- 31 July 1901
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type A)
- Page extent
- 8 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Augustus Edward Hough Love, Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The stability of the spherical nebula' by James Hopwood Jeans, 31 July 1901, RR/15/200, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_200/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-a-paper-the-stability-of-the-spherical-nebula-by-james-hopwood-jeans, accessed on 11 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_200/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-a-paper-the-stability-of-the-spherical-nebula-by-james-hopwood-jeans
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_200/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-a-paper-the-stability-of-the-spherical-nebula-by-james-hopwood-jeans" title="Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The stability of the spherical nebula' by James Hopwood Jeans" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
I. The stability of a spherical nebula External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 1st January 1902
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1902.0012
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'The stability of the spherical nebula' by James Hopwood Jeans
Creator: Horace Lamb Reference number: RR/15/199 -
Second referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The stability of the spherical nebula' by James Hopwood Jeans
Creator: Augustus Edward Hough Love Reference number: RR/15/201 -
Report by James Hopwood Jeans, on his paper 'The stability of the spherical nebula'
Reference number: RR/15/202
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 15, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1900-1902 Reference number: RR/15
Related Fellows
-
Augustus Edward Hough Love
Referee -
James Hopwood Jeans
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection