Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Francis Gotch, on a paper 'The 'blaze-currents' of the frog's eyeball' by Augustus Desire Waller

Reference number: RR/15/131

Date: January 1901

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions in full, without modification and that all the illustrations should be reproduced in accordance with the author's scheme into the text.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1901].

Endorsed on verso as received 4 January 1900.

Reference number
RR/15/131
Earliest possible date
January 1901
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Francis Gotch

View page for Francis Gotch

Use this record

Citation

Francis Gotch, Referee's report by Francis Gotch, on a paper 'The 'blaze-currents' of the frog's eyeball' by Augustus Desire Waller, January 1901, RR/15/131, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_131/referees-report-by-francis-gotch-on-a-paper-the-blaze-currents-of-the-frogs-eyeball-by-augustus-desire-waller, accessed on 25 February 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_131/referees-report-by-francis-gotch-on-a-paper-the-blaze-currents-of-the-frogs-eyeball-by-augustus-desire-waller" title="Referee's report by Francis Gotch, on a paper 'The 'blaze-currents' of the frog's eyeball' by Augustus Desire Waller" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection