Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics and chemistry

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions in full and without modification, including all the illustrations. The paper is an 'exceedingly valuable contribution to knowledge'.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1901].

Endorsed on verso as received 5 February, 1901.

Reference number
RR/15/112
Earliest possible date
January 1901
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Thomson

View page for William Thomson

Use this record

Citation

William Thomson, Referee's report by William Thomson, Lord Kelvin on a paper 'The conducitivity of gases under the becquerel rays' by Robert John Strutt, Lord Rayleigh, January 1901, RR/15/112, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_15_112/referees-report-by-william-thomson-lord-kelvin-on-a-paper-the-conducitivity-of-gases-under-the-becquerel-rays-by-robert-john-strutt-lord-rayleigh, accessed on 21 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_15_112/referees-report-by-william-thomson-lord-kelvin-on-a-paper-the-conducitivity-of-gases-under-the-becquerel-rays-by-robert-john-strutt-lord-rayleigh" title="Referee's report by William Thomson, Lord Kelvin on a paper 'The conducitivity of gases under the becquerel rays' by Robert John Strutt, Lord Rayleigh" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection