Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society', in consideration of the previous papers in the series. 'The paper is useful, though not profound!'. Suggests replacing the photographs with pencil drawings.

Subject: Zoology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on recto as received 18 January 1900.

Reference number
RR/14/254
Earliest possible date
17 January 1900
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas George Bond Howes

View page for Thomas George Bond Howes

Use this record

Citation

Thomas George Bond Howes, Referee's report by Thomas George Bond Howes, on a paper 'Upon the development of the enamel in certain osseous fish' by Charles Sissmore Tomes, 17 January 1900, RR/14/254, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_254/referees-report-by-thomas-george-bond-howes-on-a-paper-upon-the-development-of-the-enamel-in-certain-osseous-fish-by-charles-sissmore-tomes, accessed on 03 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_14_254/referees-report-by-thomas-george-bond-howes-on-a-paper-upon-the-development-of-the-enamel-in-certain-osseous-fish-by-charles-sissmore-tomes" title="Referee's report by Thomas George Bond Howes, on a paper 'Upon the development of the enamel in certain osseous fish' by Charles Sissmore Tomes" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection