Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 24 October 1899.

Reference number
RR/14/240
Earliest possible date
21 October 1899
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Joseph John Thomson

View page for Joseph John Thomson

Use this record

Citation

Joseph John Thomson, Referee's report by Joseph John Thomson, on a paper 'On the least potential difference required to produce discharge through various gases' by Robert John Strutt, 4th Baron Rayleigh, 21 October 1899, RR/14/240, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_240/referees-report-by-joseph-john-thomson-on-a-paper-on-the-least-potential-difference-required-to-produce-discharge-through-various-gases-by-robert-john-strutt-4th-baron-rayleigh, accessed on 25 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_14_240/referees-report-by-joseph-john-thomson-on-a-paper-on-the-least-potential-difference-required-to-produce-discharge-through-various-gases-by-robert-john-strutt-4th-baron-rayleigh" title="Referee's report by Joseph John Thomson, on a paper 'On the least potential difference required to produce discharge through various gases' by Robert John Strutt, 4th Baron Rayleigh" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection