Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

Subject: Botany

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 8 March 1899.

Reference number
RR/14/235
Earliest possible date
March 1899
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Gilbert Baker

View page for John Gilbert Baker

Use this record

Citation

John Gilbert Baker, Referee's report by John Gilbert Baker, on a paper 'On the structure and affinities of Matonia pectinata, R. BR., with notes on the geological history of the Matonineae' by Albert Charles Seward, March 1899, RR/14/235, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_235/referees-report-by-john-gilbert-baker-on-a-paper-on-the-structure-and-affinities-of-matonia-pectinata-r-br-with-notes-on-the-geological-history-of-the-matonineae-by-albert-charles-seward, accessed on 19 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_14_235/referees-report-by-john-gilbert-baker-on-a-paper-on-the-structure-and-affinities-of-matonia-pectinata-r-br-with-notes-on-the-geological-history-of-the-matonineae-by-albert-charles-seward" title="Referee's report by John Gilbert Baker, on a paper 'On the structure and affinities of Matonia pectinata, R. BR., with notes on the geological history of the Matonineae' by Albert Charles Seward" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection