Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The photographs should be reproduced by the phototypographical process.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 9 March 1899.

Reference number
RR/14/231
Earliest possible date
March 1899
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William de Wiveleslie Abney

View page for William de Wiveleslie Abney

Use this record

Citation

William de Wiveleslie Abney, Referee's report by William de Wiveleslie Abney, on a paper 'On the constitution of the electric spark' by Arthur Schuster and Gustav Hemsalech, March 1899, RR/14/231, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_231/referees-report-by-william-de-wiveleslie-abney-on-a-paper-on-the-constitution-of-the-electric-spark-by-arthur-schuster-and-gustav-hemsalech, accessed on 03 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_14_231/referees-report-by-william-de-wiveleslie-abney-on-a-paper-on-the-constitution-of-the-electric-spark-by-arthur-schuster-and-gustav-hemsalech" title="Referee's report by William de Wiveleslie Abney, on a paper 'On the constitution of the electric spark' by Arthur Schuster and Gustav Hemsalech" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection