Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Returns the paper and report [RR/14/23]. Finds the paper valuable, if prolix.

Subject: Applied Sciences, Meteorology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Reference number
RR/14/22
Earliest possible date
03 May 1898
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frederick John Smith

View page for Frederick John Smith

Use this record

Citation

Frederick John Smith, Letter from Frederick John Jervis-Smith, to Richard Tetley Glazebrook, regarding a paper 'Experiments on aneroid barometers at Kew observatory, and their discussion' by Charles Chree, 03 May 1898, RR/14/22, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_22/letter-from-frederick-john-jervis-smith-to-richard-tetley-glazebrook-regarding-a-paper-experiments-on-aneroid-barometers-at-kew-observatory-and-their-discussion-by-charles-chree, accessed on 21 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_14_22/letter-from-frederick-john-jervis-smith-to-richard-tetley-glazebrook-regarding-a-paper-experiments-on-aneroid-barometers-at-kew-observatory-and-their-discussion-by-charles-chree" title="Letter from Frederick John Jervis-Smith, to Richard Tetley Glazebrook, regarding a paper 'Experiments on aneroid barometers at Kew observatory, and their discussion' by Charles Chree" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection