Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

The Royal Society: Science in the Making

Letter from Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, to Richard Tetley Glazebrook, regarding a paper 'The pharmacology of aconitine, diacetyl-aconitine, benzaconine, and aconine, considered in relation to their chemical constitution' by John Theodore Cash and Wyndham Rowland Dunstan

Reference number: RR/14/18

Date: 18 January 1898

Description

Michael Foster thinks the paper should be considered by both the Physicochemical and the Physiological Committees. Asks if he can suggest a chemist to referee the paper. There is a chemical element to the paper, but the bulk is physiological.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Reference number
RR/14/18
Earliest possible date
18 January 1898
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Use this record

IIIF manifest

View​ IIIF ​ manifest Opens in new tab

Open in Mirador viewer Opens in new tab

Export this record

Download PDF Opens in new tab

Citation

Letter from Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, to Richard Tetley Glazebrook, regarding a paper 'The pharmacology of aconitine, diacetyl-aconitine, benzaconine, and aconine, considered in relation to their chemical constitution' by John Theodore Cash and Wyndham Rowland Dunstan, 18 January 1898, RR/14/18, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_18/letter-from-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-to-richard-tetley-glazebrook-regarding-a-paper-the-pharmacology-of-aconitine-diacetyl-aconitine-benzaconine-and-aconine-considered-in-relation-to-their-chemical-constitution-by-john-theodore-cash-and-wyndham-rowland-dunstan, accessed on 15 October 2024

Link to this record

https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_18/letter-from-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-to-richard-tetley-glazebrook-regarding-a-paper-the-pharmacology-of-aconitine-diacetyl-aconitine-benzaconine-and-aconine-considered-in-relation-to-their-chemical-constitution-by-john-theodore-cash-and-wyndham-rowland-dunstan

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_14_18/letter-from-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-to-richard-tetley-glazebrook-regarding-a-paper-the-pharmacology-of-aconitine-diacetyl-aconitine-benzaconine-and-aconine-considered-in-relation-to-their-chemical-constitution-by-john-theodore-cash-and-wyndham-rowland-dunstan" title="Letter from Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, to Richard Tetley Glazebrook, regarding a paper 'The pharmacology of aconitine, diacetyl-aconitine, benzaconine, and aconine, considered in relation to their chemical constitution' by John Theodore Cash and Wyndham Rowland Dunstan" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Hierarchy

This item is part of:

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection