Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Agrees with the criticisms of Micaiah John Muller Hill [RR/14/146]. Continues to find issue with the author's use of the term 'general'. Considers mathematical papers such as this to be suited to mathematical journals.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Reference number
RR/14/148
Earliest possible date
1900
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Andrew Russell Forsyth

View page for Andrew Russell Forsyth

Use this record

Citation

Andrew Russell Forsyth, Second referee's report by Andrew Russell Forsyth, on a paper 'On simultaneous partial differential equations' by Alfred Cardew Dixon, 1900, RR/14/148, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_14_148/second-referees-report-by-andrew-russell-forsyth-on-a-paper-on-simultaneous-partial-differential-equations-by-alfred-cardew-dixon, accessed on 14 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_14_148/second-referees-report-by-andrew-russell-forsyth-on-a-paper-on-simultaneous-partial-differential-equations-by-alfred-cardew-dixon" title="Second referee's report by Andrew Russell Forsyth, on a paper 'On simultaneous partial differential equations' by Alfred Cardew Dixon" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection