Letter from Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Reference number: RR/13/69
Date: 03 March 1896
Description
He is still of the opinion that the paper should be published in a book, not in the Philosophical Transactions. The author may have to rearrange and remodel the work and he should be allowed to do so. It could be typewritten satisfactorily for well under £10.
Subject: Mathematics
[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1895].
- Reference number
- RR/13/69
- Earliest possible date
- 03 March 1896
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 1 page
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Joseph Larmor, Letter from Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society, 03 March 1896, RR/13/69, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_69/letter-from-joseph-larmor-on-a-paper-octonions-by-alex-mcaulay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society, accessed on 12 November 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_69/letter-from-joseph-larmor-on-a-paper-octonions-by-alex-mcaulay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_69/letter-from-joseph-larmor-on-a-paper-octonions-by-alex-mcaulay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society" title="Letter from Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
III. Octonions External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 31st December 1896
DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1895.0071
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay
Creator: Joseph Larmor Reference number: RR/13/65 -
Referee's report by Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay
Creator: Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici Reference number: RR/13/66 -
Letter from Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici Reference number: RR/13/67 -
Referee's report by Andrew Russell Forsyth, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay
Creator: Andrew Russell Forsyth Reference number: RR/13/68 -
Letter from Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to George Howard Darwin
Creator: Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici Reference number: RR/13/70 -
Letter from Edwin Bailey Elliott, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to George Howard Darwin
Creator: Edwin Bailey Elliott Reference number: RR/13/71 -
Referee's report by George Howard Darwin, on behalf of the Mathematical Commitee, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay
Creator: George Howard Darwin Reference number: RR/13/72 -
Letter from Norman Macleod Ferrers, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: Norman Macleod Ferrers Reference number: RR/13/73 -
Letter from Richard Wright on behalf of the Secretary to the Master of Peterhouse College, Cambridge, Norman Macleod Ferrers on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Master of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Creator: Norman Macleod Ferrers Reference number: RR/13/74 -
Letter from Norman Macleod Ferrers, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: Norman Macleod Ferrers Reference number: RR/13/75
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 13, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1896-1897 Reference number: RR/13
Related Fellows
-
Joseph Larmor
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection