Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Letter from Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society

Reference number: RR/13/69

Date: 03 March 1896

Description

He is still of the opinion that the paper should be published in a book, not in the Philosophical Transactions. The author may have to rearrange and remodel the work and he should be allowed to do so. It could be typewritten satisfactorily for well under £10.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1895].

Reference number
RR/13/69
Earliest possible date
03 March 1896
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Joseph Larmor

View page for Joseph Larmor

Use this record

Citation

Joseph Larmor, Letter from Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society, 03 March 1896, RR/13/69, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_69/letter-from-joseph-larmor-on-a-paper-octonions-by-alex-mcaulay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society, accessed on 15 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_69/letter-from-joseph-larmor-on-a-paper-octonions-by-alex-mcaulay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society" title="Letter from Joseph Larmor, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay to the Secretary of the Royal Society" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection