Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Agrees with Joseph Larmor that the paper should be published as a single book, rather than in Philosophical Transactions. It is too new in matter and would be out of place in Philosophical Transactions. Wishes the Council to make a grant with the 'special £1000 a year which they receive from government' to assist in it's publication.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1895].

Reference number
RR/13/68
Earliest possible date
02 March 1896
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Andrew Russell Forsyth

View page for Andrew Russell Forsyth

Use this record

Citation

Andrew Russell Forsyth, Referee's report by Andrew Russell Forsyth, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay, 02 March 1896, RR/13/68, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_68/referees-report-by-andrew-russell-forsyth-on-a-paper-octonions-by-alex-mcaulay, accessed on 20 March 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_68/referees-report-by-andrew-russell-forsyth-on-a-paper-octonions-by-alex-mcaulay" title="Referee's report by Andrew Russell Forsyth, on a paper 'Octonions' by Alex McAulay" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection