Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

He has reconsidered the paper. It should be published in full in Philosophical Transactions. All plates should be published.

Subject: Astronomy

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1894].

Reference number
RR/13/63
Earliest possible date
08 May 1896
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
8 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Schuster

View page for Arthur Schuster

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Schuster, Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'Preliminary report on the results obtained with the prismatic camera during the total eclipse of the Sun, April 16, 1893' by Joseph Norman Lockyer, 08 May 1896, RR/13/63, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_63/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-preliminary-report-on-the-results-obtained-with-the-prismatic-camera-during-the-total-eclipse-of-the-sun-april-16-1893-by-joseph-norman-lockyer, accessed on 13 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_63/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-preliminary-report-on-the-results-obtained-with-the-prismatic-camera-during-the-total-eclipse-of-the-sun-april-16-1893-by-joseph-norman-lockyer" title="Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'Preliminary report on the results obtained with the prismatic camera during the total eclipse of the Sun, April 16, 1893' by Joseph Norman Lockyer" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection